54 Comments
Oct 26, 2022·edited Oct 26, 2022Liked by Good Citizen

Dirty bombs, just like actual nukes, would have a certain isotope ratio that is characteristic for the source. In case of Ukraine, those sources are limited to their existing (and controlled) nuclear infrastructure.

It would be identifiable, especially if the wind carries it over 3rd parties.

A Russian source would be more difficult to pin down (their nuclear industry is vast and they also do reprocessing, for example they reprocess our spent fuel chiefly because of the Plutonium in it, but there's all sorts of nasty stuff in spent fuel). When the Russians do radiological attacks, they also send a message that it was them. For example: Polonium is difficult to acquire and purify. When they chose that as a weapon for an assassination, it was meant to be understood (any dummy can make ricin that does the job just as well. Pure Polonium, that doesn't have other isotopes that might trigger a radiation sensor, in quantities, is Big Boy stuff).

Expand full comment

This article is a Russian false flag.

And my comment calling it a Russian false flag is, in turn, a Russian false flag designed to distract you away from the original Russian false flag.

In Russian Federation, flag falsified you.

Expand full comment
Oct 26, 2022Liked by Good Citizen

Were I to make bets based on current noise, my money would be closer to the 2nd of november.

Expand full comment

Now you know why every US media outlet has been screaming "RUSSIA" for the last 6 years.

Expand full comment

RT seems to be suggesting that Ukraine is going to shoot down a 'dummy 'dirty bomb over Chernobyl. The explosion at or near ground level would of course churn up a lot of radio-active material which has settled since the original meltdown. So hey presto, they have their evidence of a dirty bomb complete with fallout indistinguishable from the original Chernobyl contamination. Does Zelensky really think we are that stupid that we would fall for such a trick? I guess it doesn't matter, because the people that matter actually want to fall for it and don't really much care if the wide awake non normies in the West aren't fooled. They can rely upon the media to propagate the fake news for them.

Expand full comment
Oct 26, 2022Liked by Good Citizen

You are literally killing people with this article, just like the people that undermined trust in the covid vaccine.

Expand full comment
Oct 26, 2022Liked by Good Citizen

Made for TV reality show, brought to you by Microsoft and Pilfer, working warped speed to counteract the fallout and grid pulse: line up to be shot, and buy it!

It Takes All of Us.

Expand full comment
Oct 26, 2022Liked by Good Citizen

a dirty bomb is indistinguishable from a regular bomb except for it containing radiation, theres no big bang like a nuke going off. there will be no pretty pictures on cnn/bbc except for those blobby ones you see usually used in hurricane predictions showing where the radiation is going

Expand full comment
Oct 26, 2022Liked by Good Citizen

I'm sure the SchwabKlausians are scrambling to find that red button and nukuler codes as I type this.

Hey, Coof Diecinueve didn't work as planned, so maybe Dirty Bomb-22 is the ticket.

Fun watch trip down Memory Lane: War Games (1983) with a young Mathew Broderick.

Expand full comment

Winston Smith was puzzled by Julie's claim that it was their own government dropping the bombs on them, to keep them scared and controllable...

The Nuke Story got everyone's attention, as intended...It provided the medium for promoting the idea of a pre-emptive strike to "Stop Putin !"...Zelensky's call to Nuke Russia Before Russia Uses Nukes was

an unscripted response of someone who fell for the psy-op about What Mad Putin Would Do If He Was Losing...

Stop being Rational in explaining The Psychopaths...Psychopathology has its own rationality...

Expand full comment

America and NATO manufactured the war in the Ukraine. These knuckleheads that are supporting this war are doing nothing more than contributing to Armageddon.

Expand full comment

I've spent my whole life living under the threat of nukes, so I feel a kind of "fear fatigue" with all these reports of potential nuclear war. I'm also suspicious about the true extent of the dangers of nuclear radiation - aren't people now living fairly normal lives in Nagasaki and Hiroshima?

I suspect the ill effects of nuclear radiation and fallout, while real, have been exaggerated. What really concerns me is that they will use any nuclear attack (or report of a nuclear attack) to explain away the upcoming "fallout" from the "vaccinations." Could some of the illnesses caused by the various mRNA injections be re-branded as the result of nuclear radiation?

Expand full comment

Interesting hypothesis, will be linking it today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/

Expand full comment

When the cocaine "Nazi" said that he wanted to make the country a new Israel, he was serious (and many within his tribe agrees). Historically, it is a homeland to them.

Therefore, I predict that there is zero chance that a real nuke is used that would destroy any part or make it uninhabitable.

(((They))) will never do that to their homeland.

Now, that is not to say that they would do something that they blame as a dirty bomb to use as a reason to take the war to the next stage. But I cannot fathom that they actually set off a real nuke.

Expand full comment

I'm a crazy conspiracy theorist so I could be wrong: but I'm very skeptical nuclear weapons even exist. We have no independent confirmation of their existence. The globalists already controlled much of the world by WW2 so its possible nukes and the Cold War were another money laundering operation like NASA. (There's zero doubt the Moon Landings were 100% fake.)

http://www.zephaniah.eu/index_htm_files/Why%20Explosive%20Nuclear%20Devices%20May%20Not%20Exist.pdf

http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf

http://www.heiwaco.com/bomb.htm

Expand full comment

I'm not sure why you are referring to using footage of old nuclear explosions. A "dirty bomb" is a conventional explosive device packaged with radioactive waste. There would be no "mushroom cloud" any simulation would require.

As for isotopic fingerprinting, this is typically used to determine which enrichment facility that bomb-grade fissionable material comes from--they each reportedly have subtle differences in their output. Fingerprinting a sack full of fission products from nuclear waste is another story entirely, and would be much more difficult, perhaps impossible. This is not to mention the fact that expended nuclear waste it is probably much easier to come by than enriched fissionable material--it is much less closely guarded. And it could have been sourced from just about anywhere.

Expand full comment